Arts feature

The pop artist whose transgressions went too far – for the PC art world

His works provoked riots in the 1970s. Now Allen Jones is back at the Royal Academy after 35 years in the wilderness

1 November 2014

9:00 AM

1 November 2014

9:00 AM

Allen Jones (born 1937) has been demonised. In 1969 he made a group of three sculptures of scantily-clad female figures. They were slightly larger than life and arranged in positions that enabled them (with the addition of a glass top or padded seat) to be turned into a table, a chair and a hat stand. These super-mannequins were highly modelled, wigged and leather-booted, and unavoidably realistic. When first exhibited in 1970 they provoked outrage among the feminist community. Jones’s 1978 retrospective of graphic art at the ICA caused a near riot even though the sculptures weren’t shown. In 1986, when the chair went on display, it had acid thrown over it by an incensed extremist.

The price of being controversial is usually increased fame, but for Jones it has resulted in his work being ostracised in this country. His last museum show here was a selection of prints at the Barbican in 1995. Before that, the most recent survey of his work took place at the Serpentine Gallery in 1979, which means that he hasn’t had a proper retrospective in Britain for 35 years. This is scarcely believable: Jones is a hugely popular and successful figure in Europe (particularly in Germany), and is featured in museums all over the world. He has worked extensively in America and China, and is widely celebrated for the part he played in the origins of Pop Art in the 1960s. But he seems to have transgressed some unwritten taboo and been banished from the museums of his homeland. Could this be because so many of them are now run by timid bureaucrats?

Revealingly, a recent Jones retrospective organised by a German museum was turned down by the woman director of one of the main public galleries in London with the words ‘we don’t want any trouble’. But this is not just about political correctness; crucially, it’s about art. So, when the Royal Academy mounted a survey of Modern British Sculpture in 2011, co-curated incidentally by the director of Tate Britain, Penelope Curtis, not only was Jones excluded but, as he ruefully points out, the last figurative sculptor in the show was Henry Moore. It’s as if history has been rewritten according to the abstract thesis of modernism, and figurative work (of the kind Jones has devoted his life to) has been airbrushed out.

Jones explains the situation, as he sees it. ‘For artists of my generation, coming on stream in the Sixties, whatever you did you had to reckon with American gestural abstraction. The problem with figurative art at the time was that it had run out of steam, but the polemic was that you couldn’t do it any more, which seemed absurd after 4,000 years of people making representations of each other. To me the Pop movement was incontrovertibly a swing of the pendulum back towards representation. The problem wasn’t with representation, it was the age-old one — with the language. And the language had run out of steam. Using urban imagery as source material revitalised figurative painting, without a doubt. And recently the main thrust of the avant-garde from Basquiat and Schnabel up to Koons and company has been figuration with a vengeance.’

Above: ‘Curious Woman’, 1965; right: ‘Stand In’, 1991-92
Above: ‘Curious Woman’, 1965; right: ‘Stand In’, 1991-92

Coinciding with Jones’s RA retrospective is a commercial show of his drawings at Thomas Gibson Fine Art, 39 St James’s Street, SW1 (11 November – 9 December). Drawing is clearly central to his art, so does he draw every day? ‘If I’m not painting, yes — I think through the pencil, really. What I like is to have a strong pictorial idea and then make a storyboard on one sheet, rather than working in notebooks. I like the idea that you can see an image developing; you can refer back and play with the possibilities.’ This suggests a habit of working in series which is, in fact, one of the strategies that Jones employs. ‘If I know I’ve got a sound structure, I always square it up. It becomes a kind of scaffolding to hang the painting on. The drawing has to take its chance then, and often what I call “the good bit” in the end just has to go.’Thus it is not before time that the Royal Academy is mounting a full-career Allen Jones retrospective (in Burlington Gardens, 13 November 2014 – 25 January 2015). The exhibition will be a revelation to many, not least for the amount of sculpture on view: more than 50 years of creativity will be represented by some 80 works, only half of which are paintings. ‘I’m very pleased that the Hirshhorn Museum [in Washington DC] is lending a big diptych which I painted at the Chelsea Hotel. It’s never been seen here. And there’s a very nice little painting called “Curious Woman” also coming from America.’ A big room of paintings will be followed by what he calls ‘The Ballroom’, filled with large steel and wooden dancing figures. In the third large gallery will be the fibreglass and wood single figures arranged on a diagonal (Jones calls this ‘The Chorus Line’), dating from 1964 to now. There will be a room of drawings and the infamous furniture sculpture will be there too, set within the context of a lifetime’s remarkable achievement.

He constantly goes ‘people watching’ in search of new ideas for his art. ‘I went into Soho yesterday — all those lives going on — everyone in some way presenting themselves to the world. What happens is that I see something, often in a restaurant or theatre. Suddenly people will lean in together or their faces overlap, or the way the jacket goes, introduces something new and stops one’s depiction becoming formulaic.’

Allen Jones is an immensely charming, erudite and sophisticated artist who uses colour, subject and form in inventive and intriguing ways. His career deserves to be properly reassessed, though quite clearly there is still a mass of prejudice against him in this country. But he has hope for the future in the response of a younger generation. ‘I find the attitude of people under 35 to sexuality and display is that it’s just a part of the spectrum of existence,’ he says. ‘In a way the feminist critique is a total red herring. It’s not what the work is about.’ In fact, Jones’s paintings and sculptures deliberately pose the question: ‘What is art?’ For him, it’s all about ways of seeing and states of perception. Finally, I ask him if he sees his work as provocative. ‘I hope it is — provocative as art, as all work of the avant-garde in its time must have been.’

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first 10 weeks for just $10

Show comments
  • gram parsons

    great artist

    who’s career suffered because supprise supprise metropolitan lefties behaving like hectoring old men* desperate to be offended.

    *old men please do not take offence

    • grutchyngfysch

      I wouldn’t worry: nobody cares about old men being offended. They’re pretty near the bottom of diversity top trumps.

      • starfish

        “diversity top trumps”

        Great phrase – may I use it?

      • LordJustin

        But, with the right cards, they can still play a blinding 7 No Trumps!

    • LordJustin

      Gather up your courage, and say “old women” if you mean old women.

  • Swanky

    I remember the table. A woman on all fours, and rather inviting. A beautiful book of antiques and posh styles… but frankly his piece was the most memorable thing in it. And not like Koons: it wasn’t grotesque or offensive.

  • WFB56

    I think that this tells you more about the intolerance of feminists than it does about Mr. Jones’s work and talents.

  • Mrs.JosephineHydeHartley

    But to call those lumps of art a ” hatstand” a “chair” and a “table” is to pretend they were not statues of real women. And by calling real women- even statues of real women dressed up in a way that panders to people who both fear and crave that kind of fashion/imagery – “hatstand”, “table” and “chair” is not clever, it’s de-humanising – albeit very trendy and money-making.

    I’m not surprised somebody threw acid on one.

    • Swanky

      Or perhaps it shows that the supreme beauty and erotic appeal of a woman is such that no exquisite carpenter could compete…. I think the women too idealized, like cartoon drawings or Photoshopped pictures, to be ‘real women’: they don’t really live in the real world. They are, in a way, Wonderwoman: what a woman would like to be and what a man might fantasize about. I don’t ‘envy’ the sculptured women, since I have all the advantages of real flesh and real feeling, even with my imperfections; and I don’t feel offended, since I think the men really do worship at the temple of Woman, and this is merely an exhibition of that.

      • gram parsons

        brilliant comment!

        • Swanky

          That’s very nice, thanks. Interesting that the mannequin (if I may call her that) has the neck-to-groin strap over the choli blouse tie-string — whereas if I were wearing it, I’d put the choli on last and have the tie-string outside. I notice that when women’s clothiers (e.g. Victoria’s Secret) or others (such as this artist) want to show women with an edgy sexuality, they often reach for the ornaments of contemporary bellydance (largely invented and glamourized by Americans). A so-called ‘slave bracelet’ on this sculpture could have been interesting, and probably would have got the fems even more in an uproar!

  • Guest

    I stopped reading after ‘PC art world’ !!!

    has that EVER existed?

    • red2black

      In totalitarian states.

      • LordJustin

        PC is defined these days as an amoral media on a mission to search and destroy…well…just about anybody it feels like destroying for those oh-so-valuable clicks on the web site.

        • red2black

          Thanks for the update. (tee hee)

    • StupidWhiningMen

      In the minds of chauvinist conspiracy theorists.

  • red2black

    It’s interesting that Allen Jones’s sculptures are in part derived from the world of BDSM – a world where it’s more often the case that women are dominant and men are submissive. Would the sculptures have been the target of so much criticism if they represented men as pieces of furniture? Of course, if that had been the case, there’d be an obvious place for the ladies to hang their beach-towels (tee hee).
    In any event, the sculptures now seem very sanitised compared with more recent artworks relating to the world of BDSM elevated to fine art gallery or publication status; the work of Doris Kloster for example, which explores BDSM much more directly. It always seemed to me that Allen Jones, as with other Pop Artists, had elevated some aspect of everyday life to art gallery status, but that he had chosen a particular ‘under the counter’ feature of it.

  • dalai guevara

    Modern (Western) society has gone full circle.

    Art no longer provokes, it explains, it’s educational, for kids. Museums are no longer places for contemplation, study, thought, they are spaces for kids.

    What could possibly be wrong with that.

  • StupidWhiningMen

    Stupid old extremist.

  • LordJustin

    In a country that has just filmed the life of Turner as a perverse, feminist narrative, with Spall (perhaps influenced by an innate desire to bring Charles Laughton to a 21st Century audience) reducing the man himself to a grunting Quasimodo-esque caricature lurching between Esmeralda and the gargoyle, rather than honouring the child prodigy and man of genius that he really was, I wish him the best of luck.

  • How I was able to get my husband back from those home breaker

    My name is Mrs. Rebecca Lonan. I am from California,United States,I’ married to Mr. Greg Lonan, i am hear to give testimony of how i got back my husband, we got married for more than 9 years and have gotten two kids. thing were going well with us and we are always happy. until one day my husband started to behave in a way i could not understand, i was very confused by the way he treat me and the kids. later that month he did not come home again and he called me that he want a divorce, i asked him what have i done wrong to deserve this from him, all he was saying is that he want a divorce that he hate me and do not want to see me again in his life, i was mad and also frustrated do not know what to do,i was sick for more than 2 weeks because of the divorce. i love him so much he was everything to me without him my life is incomplete. i told my sister and she told me to contact a spell caster, i never believe in all this spell casting of a thing. i just want to try if something will come out of it. i contacted for the return of my husband to me, they told me that my husband have been taken by another woman, that she cast a spell on him that is why he hate me and also want us to divorce.then they told me that they have to cast a spell on him that will make him return to me and the kids, they casted the spell and after 2 days my husband called me and he told me that i should forgive him, he started to apologize on phone and said that he still love me that he did not know what happen to him that he left me. it was the spell that Dr Brave casted on him that make him comeback to me today,me and my family are now happy again today. thank you Dr Brave for what you have done for me i would have been nothing today if not for your great spell. i want you my friends who are passing through all this kind of love problem of getting back their husband, wife , or ex boyfriend, ex lover and girlfriend to contact Dr Brave with this via or kindly visit he website , and you will see that your problem will be solved without any delay.

  • ricpic

    How can you tell he’s an artist? He makes objects of beauty, that’s how.