Alger Hiss: Tricky Dick’s scapegoat

Nixon is reindicted, in Joan Brady’s America’s Dreyfus — for besmirching forever the reputation of lawyer and diplomat Alger Hiss

26 September 2015

8:00 AM

26 September 2015

8:00 AM

America’s Dreyfus: The Case Nixon Rigged Joan Brady

Skyscraper, pp.431, £20, ISBN: 9780993153327

In the more than 40 years since Richard Nixon resigned as president — disgraced as much by his inveterate lying as by his actual crimes related to Watergate — history has been relatively kind to him. Compared with Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, Nixon in retrospect can seem statesmanlike, thoughtful and liberal-minded. He established diplomatic relations with communist China, took the US off the gold standard, negotiated the wind-down of the Vietnam war, and created the Environmental Protection Agency — accomplishments that generally prompt even Nixon-haters to pause before they condemn Tricky Dick to perdition.

But now comes Joan Brady with a bracing reminder of what indeed was so hateful, so villainous about Nixon and his political ascent. For her outraged new book about his persecution of the internationalist lawyer and New Deal diplomat Alger Hiss is as much a reindictment of Nixon as it is an attempt, once and for all, to clear Hiss of the accusation that he betrayed his country in the service of Soviet Russia. Whether Hiss can ever be fully exonerated remains a vexed question that ultimately has little to do with the flimsy and compromised evidence brought against him.

Brady has done a convincing job of reading and reinvigorating the long trial and hearing transcripts, as well as a vast amount of published and unpublished literature about the case. To her credit, she has rendered the Hiss/Nixon duel more compelling for a younger audience unfamiliar with ‘the trial of the century’ by styling this cri de coeur as a memoir and relating chatty anecdotes about her complicated friendship with Hiss. Specialists may quibble with Brady’s reliance on her own life story to enliven the recounting of Hiss’s tragic fall. But her personal feelings about the red-baiting that engulfed America in the late 1940s and early 1950s, viewed through the intimidation of her father and husband by anti-communist hysteria, make America’s Dreyfus an absorbing read. The problem with the book is that, despite Brady’s best efforts to bring closure to the Hiss affair, one is still left wondering not about why Hiss went to jail, his brilliant career destroyed, but how Nixon got away with what he did.

As every American high school student ought to know, Hiss was convicted (after his first trial ended in a hung jury) on two counts of perjury stemming from his relationship with the confessed ex-communist and mentally unstable bisexual Whittaker Chambers — convicted not of espionage, nor of Communist party membership (which was legal, anyway), nor of releasing top-secret State Department documents that endangered national security. The case for espionage was weak and the statute of limitations had already run out, so perjury — whether Hiss was lying when he denied giving government documents to Chambers or that he had seen Chambers (known to Hiss as George Crosley) after 1937 — was the only route to the hanging. Encouraged by the House Un-American Activities Committee, Chambers hurled all manner of easily refutable accusations at Hiss, chiefly that Hiss ran a communist cell inside the State Department and that the two were close friends as well as party comrades. But thanks to Nixon’s genius for public relations, his shrewd understanding of Hiss’s penchant for self-defeat, and his savagely corrupt political ambition, this junior Republican member of HUAC managed, while making himself famous, to also put Franklin Roosevelt’s foreign-policy record on trial.

It’s an oversimplification to suggest, as Brady does, that the Hiss affair was a proxy counterattack by right-wingers and Nazi sympathisers against the New Deal policies of social welfare, income redistribution and ‘world government’ in the form of the United Nations (Hiss had helped found it). However, hatred of FDR and all he stood for certainly played a part, since by the time Nixon was done trying Hiss in the press — leaking secret grand-jury testimony, coaching Chambers on his accusations and lying to reporters — the dead Roosevelt, not just Hiss, had been convicted of treason by large segments of the public.

This treason centred on the alleged wartime appeasement of Stalin — a myth that was essential to promoting ‘the most macabre horror of right-wing folklore’, as the historian Rick Perlstein describes it. In this version of US history, loyal Americans are constantly betrayed by politicians engaged in secret schemes epitomised by ‘the 1945 negotiations at Yalta in which an enfeebled Franklin D. Roosevelt, with Soviet agent Alger Hiss supposedly whispering advice into his ear, sold out eastern Europe to the Reds’.

There’s no question that Hiss was at Yalta, advising FDR and his British counterparts. But so was most of the American foreign-policy establishment, in spirit if not in body. As pitifully few Americans are now aware, the Soviet Union was America’s indispensable military ally, essential to defeating Hitler’s Germany, prepared to help finish off Japan, and already occupying large portions of eastern Europe when Yalta took place.

Brady is neither a professional historian nor an investigative journalist. But she is a very good judge of character, and the book is strongest in its analysis of the contrasting personalities of the patrician, Harvard-educated Hiss, and the striving, working-class Nixon. ‘As smart as Robespierre,’ Brady writes, ‘Nixon was one of those rare people who really were born to lead; where he went, others followed.’ He was also an excellent poker player and master of the bluff. His combination of innate political ability and tactical intelligence was devastating against the political amateur Hiss, who time and again granted advantages to Chambers, Nixon and Nixon’s friends in the press. ‘New England arrogance is legendary — self-righteous, effete, insolent,’ writes Brady. ‘Harvard epitomised it and Alger epitomised Harvard.’

This arrogance, as much as Nixon’s opportunism and political ambition, is what brought Hiss the ‘do-gooder’ down. So great was his sense of entitlement, so deep was his belief in his own integrity and immunity from reproach, that he foolishly relinquished his precious constitutional entitlement, the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. Had he merely brought a smart lawyer to the first HUAC hearing, history might have been different.

Of course, as things turned out, Nixon also thought himself above the common herd, immune from prosecution under the law as it applied to everyone else. But that’s another story.

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

Available from the Spectator Bookshop, £18 Tel: 08430 600033

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first 10 weeks for just $10

Show comments
  • Walker Dollahon

    Ummm… Hiss was a spy. The released post-Soviet Verona cables??

    • Jani Cox

      my Aunty Brooke got a year old Audi TT Coupe just by some part-time working online at home. original siteAfterearning an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I’m finally getting 97 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online.….. Weekly paycheck… Bonus opportunities…earn upto $16k to $19k /a month…Only a few hour required to understand and start working,..,kaxl….

      Your dream will be Success . See Below…And be your Boss……


      • samton909

        My auntie got a wart on her toe.

  • stewart

    Did I really read this in the above article?
    “Brady is neither a professional historian nor an investigative journalist. But she is a very good judge of character”
    Perhaps Mr MacArthur should try reading something by an investigative journalist
    I suggest ‘Hoodwinked’ by Jack Cashill, then he might understand the evidence against hiss is neither ‘flimsy’ or ‘compromised’. Though perhaps he already does ,after all why let the facts stand in the way of a good narrative? (as in)
    ” the Hiss affair was a proxy counterattack by right-wingers and Nazi sympathisers against the New Deal policies of social welfare,”

  • WFB56

    A ridiculous whitewash and revisionist history of the worst kind which is presumably only “published'(its only available electronically) to feed the delusions of the Nixon haters. Presumably the only reason that the editor ran this in the Spectator was that he owed mr. MacArthur a favour.

    • Sean L

      It also appears in the printed magazine.

      • WFB56

        I should have said that the book was only printed electronically because it wasn’t worth the expense of a physical printing.

        • Sean L

          Thanks for the clarification. Odd that The Spectator see fit to review a book that isn’t deemed worthy of even printing… It’s not as if there’s a shortage of ‘serious’ books being published…

  • carl jacobs

    Hiss was a Communist spy. Of this there is no doubt.

    • Charles Lufkin

      This is the MOST idiotic piece of nonsense I have read in the Spectator in a long time.Completely untrue.Even the reds accept Hiss was a commie dupe.

      • carl jacobs

        You see, I have an unimpeachable Witness. Hiss was a spy.

  • bindare

    Communists never give up trying to re-write history. Even their masters in Moscow are more honest than American and English Communists and Fellow-Travelers.

  • samton909

    So the Spectator is where all those old communists went to write after communism became unfashionable, (Unfashionable even among the literati)

  • Gebhard Von Blucher

    Oh dear! The reviewer obviously didn’t engage his critical faculties for this one. This is the sort of crud I would expect to read in the New York Times.

  • John Haynes

    The book is a historical travesty that ignores more than sufficient evidence (Chambers’ production of extracts from stolen State Department documents in Hiss’s own handwriting, the Venona decryption, and Vassiliev’s copies of KGB records), and the reviewer is a historical ignoramus.

  • D. Strange

    Following the opening of KGB archives in the 1990s, even the US left wingnuts accepted that Hiss was a spy for Stalin. Pathetically clueless reviewer.

  • Davedeparis

    Well if this review is accurate then the book in question is pure revisionism. With the fall of the Warsaw Pact state intelligence archives confirmed beyond all reasonable doubt that Hiss’s guilt. As Tony Judt, hardly your typical cold warrior, pointed out the left’s failure to accept this was symptomatic of a broader intellectual failure. It is also worth keeping in mind that Chambers was a former CP member and the cold war left never forgave him and that Roosevelt’s tilt towards the USSR and hostility to Britain towards the end of his life was a very real thing, was at least in part ideologically motivated by and had real human consequences.

  • MrJones

    McCarthy was right.

  • mdj

    ‘But she is a very good judge of character…’; but writes a whole book seemingly unaware that she is completely wrong about Hiss.
    So how good a judge of character is Mr MacArthur?