Allan Massie’s Bordeaux Quartet: truer to Occupied France than any history

End Games in Bordeaux, the final volume, has too much action but some vintage details

10 October 2015

9:00 AM

10 October 2015

9:00 AM

End Games in Bordeaux Allan Massie

Quartet, pp.280, £12, ISBN: 9780704373761

In a recent book review, the historian Norman Stone wrote: ‘Maybe the second world war can now be left to novelists.’ Perhaps he was thinking of Allan Massie’s 1989 masterpiece A Question of Loyalties, an utterly convincing portrayal of a man making all the wrong choices for the noblest reasons in Vichy France. It’s such fertile territory that Massie has returned to it for a quartet of detective novels set in Occupied Bordeaux.

The final part, End Games in Bordeaux, sees Superintendent Lannes suspended at the wishes of his German overlords. He is politically suspect but there isn’t much to do anyway: ‘Nobody’s been murdering anybody, except what they will call war-work,’ one character says. Lannes’s family embodies the conflicts within France. One son, Alain, has fled to London to fight with De Gaulle. The mother’s favourite, Dominique, is in Vichy working to instil patriotic values in deprived children and, most tragically of all, his daughter, Clothilde, has fallen in love with a deluded patriot called Michel who joins the Germans fighting on the Eastern Front. This is vintage Massie — where we would see a fanatical Nazi, Massie gives us an easily led and not terribly bright idealist.

Lannes isn’t any more popular with the Resistance, who appear as little more than gangsters extorting money in return for protection when the war is over. I hope I’m not spoiling things too much to say that the Germans lose. Whereas the earlier novels are languid and claustrophobic, End Games has almost too much action for such a short book. There are moments of breathtaking excitement as Massie cuts between protagonists in Bordeaux, London, Paris and Russia. Lannes, so commanding in the early days of the war, now appears naive. Everyone around him is playing realpolitik whereas he charges around like a knight errant trying to solve crimes, right wrongs and save people he hardly knows. Unable to align with either side, he is suspected by both.

His son Dominique is wiser, making contact with the Resistance even while working for Vichy. The smoothest politician of all is François Mitterrand, who has a cameo role in the series first as a Vichy functionary and then as a leading light in the Resistance. ‘Vichy was necessary. I’ll never deny that — except in public,’ he says at one point. Finishing Massie’s Bordeaux Quartet, it’s hard to imagine how any work of history could give one a better understanding of the complexities of Occupied France.

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

Available from the Spectator Bookshop, £10.90 Tel: 08430 600033

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first 10 weeks for just $10

Show comments
  • Frank

    It is a bit like the debate between the chicken and the pig as to which has the greatest commitment to breakfast. In other words, Massie seems to know the issues, but cannot get his books to convey the absolute intimate horror of complicity, everyday collaboration and betrayal. In few other countries could Mitterand have so easily overcome his curious war time behaviour and it strikes me that France’s reluctance to genuinely examine what went on during those years is still infecting her politics today.

    • But what is the point of putting the behaviour of people in extremis under the microscope to be debated by twats lounging about in coffee shops or their sofas over social media. We all just go along to get along most of the time.

      • Frank

        If the foundations of a society are mainly built on inaccurate stories and myths, you do not have a solid basis for politics, or history.
        You may regard that as irrelevant, but then you probably grew up in a society built on reasonably solid facts.
        As an example, Austria passed a law in the 1950s exonerating everyone for all actions done during the second world war. This was convenient if you were a war criminal, but didn’t do much for sorting the wheat from the chaff in terms of post-war politics and society.