The Hinkley Point disaster

Britain’s new nuclear power plant, if it happens, is guaranteed to produce some of the most expesnive energy in the world

24 October 2015

9:00 AM

24 October 2015

9:00 AM

How easy it would be to scorn the environmentalists who are up in arms about George Osborne’s new pet project, the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station. You can understand their anxiety: subsidies for green energy are being slashed, yet the Chancellor will do anything — and pay anything — to get this project up and running. He is happy to force households to pay artificially high prices for a form of energy which brings all kinds of risks — of which the world was reminded this week when Japan found the first cancer case liked to the Fukushima disaster of 2011. ‘Has the Chancellor lost his mind?’ they ask.

Some 30 years ago, Greenpeace members might have been chaining themselves to the fences outside Hinkley Point in protest at a new nuclear power station. However, in the space of a generation, atomic power has been transformed from a leukaemia-causing, earth-poisoning environmental outrage to a low carbon, ‘green’ form of energy — astonishing enough in itself.

But this time, Greenpeace has a point. The most remarkable thing about the project is how it has managed to evade Osborne’s cull of subsidies for other low-carbon power projects. While money is being saved on wind and sea power, the battle to bail out Hinkley Point C is being fought as if the Chancellor’s career depended on it. He used his trip to China last month to offer yet another sweetener for investors in Hinkley Point. The government, he said, would guarantee £2 billion worth of loans for the project, describing the deal as a ‘golden relationship between Britain and China — the world’s oldest civil nuclear power and the world’s fastest-growing civil nuclear power’. China has even been invited to build its own plant in Essex, to the dismay of our spies, who spend much time trying to ensure nuclear power stations are protected from Chinese cyber-espionage.

The Treasury’s bribes may only be the start: it has sought, and been granted, EU permission to guarantee up to £16 billion worth of loans — enough to fund nearly two thirds of Hinkley Point’s current estimated construction cost of £24 billion. There is no reason to believe that figure, though. The chosen design for Hinkley Point C is the European Pressurised Reactor, which doesn’t yet exist, although some are under construction in France, Finland and China. All have been delayed, the Finnish one by nine years so far.

Though Hinkley Point C is more than six years behind schedule, it was only this week that its supposed sponsor, the French state-owned EDF, was finally poised to commit itself. In 2007, EDF promised that we would be able to cook our turkeys on power generated at Hinkley C by Christmas 2017. An interesting promise, perhaps minted by the company’s media strategist Andrew Brown (brother of the then-Prime Minister Gordon). EDF put a lot into wooing the Brits, but it’s now talking about turkeys by Christmas 2023. At the earliest.

Osborne’s loan guarantee is a straightforward bung to the Chinese state, whose energy agencies will be providing finance. It’s all rather odd: having privatised energy in the 1980s in the hope of drawing in private finance, the Conservatives now seem quite happy to use British taxpayers’ money to help other people’s governments build our energy infrastructure.

But that isn’t where the financial pain for the British public will end. There is also the small matter of the jaw-dropping price that the Treasury has agreed: £92.50 per MWh, which is double the current market rate. This will rise with inflation for 35 years. If that price seemed daft enough two years ago when the promise was made, it looks even more ludicrous now after a collapse in energy prices. The world energy outlook is changed utterly — and it looks like we’re being saddled with a very expensive solution from a bygone era.

Nuclear power has defied the fear-mongers of the 1950s in proving itself extremely safe. Yet it can hardly claim to be a great boon for the environment either. The problem of what to do with radioactive waste has never really been solved. While no nuclear accident has killed vast numbers — estimated deaths related to the Chernobyl disaster are still in double figures 30 years on, while not a single death has been attributed to the Fukushima accident following the tsunami of 2011 — the economic cost of a nuclear accident in a crowded country such as Britain would be unbearable. If a 20-kilometre exclusion zone had to be set up around Hinkley, as it was around Fukushima, it would mean the abandonment of Taunton, Bridgwater and Weston-super-Mare, as well as the closure of the M5 and the main railway line to the West Country.

In the early days of nuclear power, such risks seemed worth taking in return for an endless supply of cheap energy. But with electricity at twice today’s market rate? Nuclear power may end up going the same way as the hovercraft and Concorde: a British-developed technology which impressed the world for a while — but which has ultimately proved just too expensive.

As the government wrestles with the legacy of Ed Miliband’s time as Environment Secretary, the world is moving on. A revolution in gas extraction through fracking has led to a collapse in gas prices as well as a steep cuts in carbon emissions in the US. Gas has trumped nuclear power just as the Boeing 747 trumped Concorde: the practical, cheap rather workaday technology eclipsing the flashy but expensive one.

That said, Osborne can claim to be a pioneer in one regard: no other country has found a way of making nuclear power cost anything like £92.50 per MWh. Two years ago, the chemical giant Ineos — one of the world’s largest energy consumers — agreed a price guarantee on a French nuclear power station of just £32.60 per MWh. Austerity-struck Britain may be about to produce the most expensive energy in the world.

Hinkley C began as a panic project to try to meet the arbitrary target in Miliband’s Climate Change Act to cut carbon emissions by 80 per cent by 2050. EDF smelled the fear and negotiated accordingly. Osborne has kept the project going way beyond the point at which common sense said it ought to have been dumped. Hinkley C won’t be cooking our turkeys two Christmasses hence; it has itself become the turkey.

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first 10 weeks for just $10

Show comments
  • Paxus Calta

    For a myriad of reasons, including British rate payers having to guarantee funding for the Hinkley C project even if it collapses, deceptive practices on the part of EdF, committing the UK to build an all Chinese reactor in the UK, crushing the UK renewables market and terrible pricing of electricity, this may well be the worst deal ever.


  • Flabbergaste

    I’m mystified why we can’t put a consortium together including Amec, Balfour Beaty or Vickers etc, to design and construct a new nuclear power generation station?

    • drumroll please

      And that would matter for what reason?
      Who cares who builds that silly thing, what matters is who owns it, who draws profits from it and who insures against a level 4-7 incident on the INES scale.

    • post_x_it

      Vickers? You mean the Vickers that disappeared more than 15 years ago when its remains were scattered across Rolls-Royce and BAE Systems?
      Amec and Balfour Beatty are both heavily involved at Hinkley Point, but neither of them has the experience of designing and building a whole nuclear power station, which is why EDF is in the lead.

  • Retired Nurse

    How on earth did nuclear power become ‘green’? I missed a meeting….

    • Gahd McAfi

      Easy, comprehensively repackage the risk in a credit default sense until it is untraceable and hence zero whilst advertising its carbon-neutral credentials.

      • Leo

        what is a “credit default sense”?

    • sidor

      It is quite simple. No impact on the environment. No gases to the atmosphere, if that is your concern. Anything else? And, for heavens sake, don’t repeat that silly demagoguery for housewives about nuclear waste with long halftime.

    • △rcticSku△

      Hinkley Pint C is going to be pretty green ‘cos its going to be scapped after running years over deadline and after not having generated a single mW of energy.


      • post_x_it

        Still not as good as what the Austrians did at Zwentendorf in the 70s.
        They managed to build a shiny new nuclear power station. Actually finished it, all ready to go. Just before they switched it on, they had a quick referendum on whether or not they actually wanted a nuclear power station, which went narrowly against. So they just left it there, and built a coal-fired power station next to it and switched that one on instead.
        Takes some beating.

  • I am sure the Chinese could also run the British armed forces and military intelligence more efficiently. It is all a question of cost-effectiveness. Capitalism works best in a communist dictatorship. Comrades Davey and Georgie seem to have learned the lesson well.

    • △rcticSku△

      They probs do a good job of running the government too. Now if only we could outsource that.

    • Gilbert White

      Very clever Paul, but elites will not understand you?

  • john_busby

    The EC Commission’s decision allowed two forms of state aid, a £17 billion credit guarantee for bank loans to go with £7.5 billion equity of which the Chinese state companies would have provided around £2 billion. Osborne in offering a £2 billion guarantee was not in accordance with the EC Commission’s ruling which does not allow equity support.
    Instead, as far as can be deduced, the cost of HPC has risen to £18 billion, with a £6 billion equity payment by the Chinese companies. EdF is now to sell assets to raise the other £12 billion, a doubtful prospect and it is seeking other investors. The credit guarantee is not needed.
    The deal rests on the holding of the “strike” price of £92,50/MWh plus inflation, which in 2026 when the plant might be commissioned will be around £110-£120/MWh. The Austrian government’s nullity action in the European Court of Justice challenges the legitimacy of “operational aid” (Betreibshilfe) in its plea 3 of the ten pleas in its action. If successful, presumably the UK government will appeal, but this will mean further delays.
    Hopefully Ross Clark’s fears will not mature and the Somerset Levels remain pristine.