High life

Anna Wintour has dragged the Met Gala into the gutter

It used to be fun but she has turned it into a freak show of publicity-starved clowns

14 May 2016

9:00 AM

14 May 2016

9:00 AM

New York

It was the best of times — downtown — and the worst of times — uptown. Let’s start with the horror near the park: cranial atrophy, unrelenting grossness, overarched and overgrown eyebrows, posterior-baring bondage outfits, and de haut en bas attitudes were the order of the night. Never has a museum site been more desecrated by a freak show, and the Met — maybe the best museum in the whole wide world — should be ashamed of itself. A great institution such as the Met always needs funds, but allowing a freak show of publicity-starved clowns is not the answer. Let’s take it from the top.

The Metropolitan Museum gala ball used to be a chic affair, where social-climbing millionaires could buy a table for the evening and invite their betters. Mrs William Buckley was chairman and ran it as she ran her own house. With elegance and discretion. Twenty or so years ago, Anna Wintour took over, and it’s been downhill ever since. This year it reached its nadir. Apple was the sponsor, and the slobs that paid 30,000 big ones just to get in matched those exhibitionists and bum bandits who paid 300,000 smackers for their own tables for eight. Sourpusses ruled the day. The unsmiling (except for the camera) crowd’s attitude is one and the same the world over: how dare you; do you know who I am? And they are an ugly bunch, these mega-celebrity types that la Wintour invites — Lady Gaga, Madonna, Maria Sharapova, the ubiquitous Kardashians, the horror of Kanye West in ripped jeans for a black-tie affair… I could go on.

I used to attend the fashion gala regularly back in the good old days. The place was full of friends, with lotsa models and the odd actress thrown into the mix. It was a fun party until NY society collided with new money. Now even the new money hides when faced with celebrity trash. Mister Jay Z’s wife arrived last, and ink-stained wretches popped inquiries on such original subjects as the state of her marriage. The most preposterous poseur among a thousand such species was one Hamish Bowles, a Brit. A popinjay of rare ridiculousness, he would besmirch a group of arrested-development 12-year-olds with his lightness of being. But enough said about the freak show and the dysfunctionality of fashion.

Five miles south of the Met, on Ludlow Street, the wonderful Metrograph cinema held a different evening, one honouring the great director James Toback’s long-lost documentary The Big Bang. Toback has always been obsessed with ‘the orgasmic explosion of God’, and the question of how one connects man and the cosmos. He shot it back in 1989, and recently discovered it somewhere in his archives. Wittgenstein’s idea that words mislead as well as inform is his guide. According to Toback, the universe is both chaotic and ordered, like us.

Actually, it’s a film about humanity: a philosopher nun, a murderer, a mother who has lost a child, a top violinist who struggles with addiction, a great basketball star, a playwright, a tavern keeper. All spoke without guile, because Toback is an expert interviewer, kind but to the point. He lets the camera run, and gets great results. There are some poignant moments, such as the beautiful Missy Boyd, who lost her daughter in a car accident; the Hollywood top banana who was raised a Catholic, and the pain his parents inflicted on him to make him a good Christian; the playwright who pretends to be in control but is very lost. The film touches on the human agony that everyone feels at some point in their life.

I liked the mobster, one of the best-looking men I’ve ever seen — smart, tough, unyielding, until he talks about his father, whose courage and lack of self-pity during a five-year struggle with cancer bring tears to the hitman’s eyes. Afterwards, that great wordsmith James Walcott interviewed Jimmy Toback on the stage. Listening to two intelligent men discussing film and life in general was a treat. (Especially when yours truly’s name came up and the 38-year run of this column in The Spectator.)

Afterwards I had to go out and get drunk. I roamed the village alone, went into a bar, had a couple of stiff doubles and thought about the evening. One thing I am certain of is that it was the only time any of the attendees uptown will visit a museum. The unrelenting grossness of the celebrity-fashion tribe is depressing as hell, but such are the joys of the modern world. The event downtown made life worth living. It showed how wrong the Western ethos that everyone should be a winner every day is. Uptown the lust for publicity and fame has robbed most of those attending the gala ball of their humanity. Downtown there were no egos tapping as if on parade. This was real life, with all its triumphs and disasters, all the joys and heartbreaks. So I got nice and drunk and felt awful the next day, but such is life.

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first 10 weeks for just $10

Show comments
  • Sanctimony

    Take a peek at the aforementioned geek, Hamish Bowles…. it’s a guinea a minute… don’t forget to look at his photograph gallery:


    • PetaJ

      I did. Good grief.

  • PeterK10

    The world never tires of minor talents with 24/7 press agents. I saw this headline elsewhere today, “Paris Hilton’s Timeless Style: A Retrospective.” Good Lord, save us from ourselves.

    • antoncheckout

      Most ladies would be sensitive about having the word ‘Retrospective’ applied to themselves.
      But Paris may not have come across the word before, so that’s all good then.

      • PeterK10

        Excellent! Perhaps even style is a strange concept to that empty head.

  • Sanctimony

    Anna Nuclear Wintour… she who wears the ‘dry ice’ thongs…. It’s rumoured she gives birth to Eskimos….

  • Mary Ann

    Oh dear, what a pity, how sad, never mind, doesn’t matter.

    • fundamentallyflawed

      For once you get an uptick

  • MC73

    It sounds terrible, but I am sure it always was. On the bright side, I doubt you run the risk of encountering Mary Ann, who infests these boards, at such an occasion. And, some hopes at least these bozos subsidise some art…

    I’d not heard of Mr Bowles, but thanks to google I now know what Richard Hammond would look like if he contracted AIDS.

    • Jean de Valette

      Mary Ann would have loved to attend, but unfortunately had to send her regrets as she is far too busy at her paid online troll job in Moscow.

  • eclair

    Poor Hamish, a wonderful name like Hamish and he’s evidently driven frantic trying to live up to it. He reminds me of minor civil servant I met in Bolton in 1972.

  • English Patriot

    I never knew that Jimmy Tarbuck was a film director! Oh sorry Toback!