unless I’m mistaken, but back in the day when I actually watched Big Brother (circa series one with Nasty Nick et al) collusion – especially when it comes to nominations – and discussing nominations is against the rules of the Big Brother House. So how did these slebs conspire to permanently nominate Bear until he gets evicted without a discussion? and when did such behaviour fall within the rules of the Big Brother House?
as for poor old Biggins’ treatment, the worst part of it is that there will no doubt be many viewers who’d cringed as soon as they heard...
Already a subscriber? Log in
Get 10 issues
for $10
Subscribe to The Spectator Australia today for the next 10 magazine issues, plus full online access, for just $10.
- Delivery of the weekly magazine
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in