<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-K3L4M3" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

Flat White

Love and Thoms: this isn’t closing the gap, but entrenching our differences

14 February 2020

1:11 PM

14 February 2020

1:11 PM

Friends, Romans, Countrymen – Lend me your ears and hear my words. 

This week the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth, finding by a majority of 4v3 that two men born overseas and resident in, but not citizens of, Australia could not be deported due to each of them having indigenous Australian ancestry.  

For the sake of clarity, a child born overseas to at least one Australian parent is eligible for Australian citizenship but doesn’t not become an Australian citizen as of right at birth.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Get 10 issues
for $10

Subscribe to The Spectator Australia today for the next 10 magazine issues, plus full online access, for just $10.

  • Delivery of the weekly magazine
  • Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
  • Spectator podcasts and newsletters
  • Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or

Unlock this article

REGISTER


Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Close