Bridge

Bridge

29 March 2014

9:00 AM

29 March 2014

9:00 AM

You’ve probably read about the English Bridge Union’s attempt to get bridge reclassified as a sport rather than a game — meaning that its members would no longer have to pay VAT on entry fees for competitions. Last month, a tax tribunal rejected the move on the grounds that ‘a sport normally connotes a game with an athletic element’. You may think this sounds reasonable enough, but, as my six-year-old daughter would say, it not fair!

Many other European countries, including France, Holland and Poland, classify bridge as a sport — as does the International Olympic Committee. And HMRC recognises games like darts, billiards and croquet as sports — hardly ‘athletic’ activities — so why not bridge?


It’s not as if bridge makes no physical demands on a player. At a competitive level, it is absolutely gruelling. When I used to play regularly with Espen Erichsen, he was forever nagging me to go the gym to improve my stamina (fat chance). So come on, Mr Taxman, give us a break.

At the recent NEC Cup in Japan, two top athletes had a chance to show their skill on this deal:

North led the 9. Declarer — England’s Frances Hinden — made the nice play of putting up the Q from dummy. If South ducks, she can cash the J and still has the K as an entry to cash the rest of her hearts. New Zealander Martin Reid therefore won the A and responded to Hinden’s coup with one of his own: he returned the J, forcing her to win the diamond in her hand, and cutting her off from the heart suit: she was now one down.

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first 10 weeks for just $10


Show comments
Close