<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-K3L4M3" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

Features Australia

Ming was not a nationalist

Conservative revisionists and Liberal partisans can’t accept that Sir Robert Menzies was an empire man

2 August 2014

9:00 AM

2 August 2014

9:00 AM

The Liberal party has moved much further to the right than in the days of its illustrious founder Sir Robert Menzies. While the party continues to celebrate Menzies’s life and political achievements, it has no wish to recreate the sort of closed in, protected nation which Menzies did so much to preserve in the 1950s and 1960s.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Subscribe for just $2 a week

Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.

  • Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
  • The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
  • Spectator podcasts and newsletters
  • Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or

Unlock this article

REGISTER

David Day’s first book was Menzies and Churchill at War (1986), which was republished by Thistle Books in 2013 as Churchill at War. His biography of Paul Keating will be published in November.

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.


Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Close