Barometer

Do Scots really die that much younger?

Plus: Tips for picking a Grand National winner; and the difference compulsory voting makes

11 April 2015

9:00 AM

11 April 2015

9:00 AM

The Scottish way of death

Nicola Sturgeon said the SNP would block a rise in the state pension age on the grounds that it would be unfair to Scots, who don’t live as long as the English.
— The idea that the Scots die early was fuelled by a study by the Glasgow Centre for Population Health in 2006, which found male life expectancy in the Calton area of Glasgow to be 54: less than in many developing countries.
— The figure, derived from statistics collected between 1998 and 2002, was exaggerated by the presence of a large number of hostels in the Calton taking in drug addicts from other areas. Life expectancy in Glasgow as whole last year was 73 for men and 78.5 for women, the lowest for any council area in Britain but not by much. In Blackpool it is 74.3 for males.
— Taking Scotland as a whole, life expectancy between 2011 and 2013 was 76.8 for men and 80.9 for women. In England it was 79.2 and 82.9. Life expectancy for English men in 2004 was the same as for Scottish men now.

How to pick a winner

Want to pick a winner in the Grand National? According to www.grand-national-guide.co.uk, the ten most recent winners shared all of the following characteristics:
— Between 9 and 12 years old
— Handicap rating of over 135
— Weight of 11 stone 6lb or under
— Have won a race longer than 3 miles
— Have run at least 10 chases
— Have won a chase worth at least £13,000

Forced to vote?


The think tank IPPR proposed that first-time voters should be compelled to vote. Does compulsory voting really make people turn out? Here are some turnout figures from recent national elections:

Compulsory voting countries
Australia 93%
Belgium 89%
Argentina 79%
Brazil 79%
Turkey 74%

 

Non-compulsory voting countries
France 80%
Italy 75%
Germany 72%
US 68%
UK 66%

Overall, countries with compulsory voting have an average turnout of 72% and those without an average turnout of 65%.
Source: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first 10 weeks for just $10


Show comments
  • Peter Bering

    They die younger because they have no heart. Ever since the pitiful referendum result last year that territory must surely be called North Britannia.

  • Callipygian

    My mother-in-law handed me an article yesterday that tells us how to live to 100. My first thought was Why would I want to? I don’t want to become as frail white and wrinkled as I can possibly be. (Trust me: even the best of ’em get frail white and wrinkled: it is nature’s plan just like Clarkson getting sacked from the BBC.) I don’t want to get old: I want to go to 50 and then start all over again from age 20 for a second run. (The years before that were strictly ones of training and essentially a waste of time.) Failing that I’ll settle for dying ‘young’. Ish.

    • Kennie

      Years ago, some youngster who had just read some article or other, said he would never want to be old and asked me if I would like to live to be 90. I told him to ask me again when I am 89 (and still mobile I hope)

      • Callipygian

        Yes, well I must say that 47 was at one time unthinkable, yet here I am. I suppose that no one wants to ‘go to 100’ unless they can be in terrific health almost to the end. But in that case, what are they saying? That they want to be 90 or 100 and then one day slip on ice and break their heads? And my point is that it’s worse to be than a great old gal/fellow than a great young one — but obviously there will come a point when we don’t have any choice.

  • MathMan

    Might the fried Mars Bars, super strength lager and 60 fags a day be contributing factors to a short life?

    • Fraziel

      How about trying not to be such a racist w*nker?

      • MikeH

        Good idea, go for it Fraziel. I’m sure you’ll feel a lot less dirty once you quit. W*nking racists sounds a most unpleasant hobby.

      • vieuxceps2

        Is it not time to forget or even forgo this tired lazy label of “racist”? It’s mostly meaningless and in this case especially so.

    • Truck67

      Not any more than poverty itself.

Close