<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-K3L4M3" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

Lead book review

Comment on Christopher Biggins and the fall of civilisation by SunnyD

11 August 2016

8:43 PM

11 August 2016

8:43 PM

unless I’m mistaken, but back in the day when I actually watched Big Brother (circa series one with Nasty Nick et al) collusion – especially when it comes to nominations – and discussing nominations is against the rules of the Big Brother House. So how did these slebs conspire to permanently nominate Bear until he gets evicted without a discussion? and when did such behaviour fall within the rules of the Big Brother House?
as for poor old Biggins’ treatment, the worst part of it is that there will no doubt be many viewers who’d cringed as soon as they heard...

Already a subscriber? Log in

Subscribe for just $2 a week

Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.

  • Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
  • The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
  • Spectator podcasts and newsletters
  • Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or

Unlock this article

REGISTER


Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Close