unless I’m mistaken, but back in the day when I actually watched Big Brother (circa series one with Nasty Nick et al) collusion – especially when it comes to nominations – and discussing nominations is against the rules of the Big Brother House. So how did these slebs conspire to permanently nominate Bear until he gets evicted without a discussion? and when did such behaviour fall within the rules of the Big Brother House?
as for poor old Biggins’ treatment, the worst part of it is that there will no doubt be many viewers who’d cringed as soon as they heard...
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe for just $2 a week
Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in