<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-K3L4M3" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

Letters

Australian letters

26 November 2016

9:00 AM

26 November 2016

9:00 AM

Latham returns

Sir: Wow; he’s back! And still giving it to the a…holes. A great column. Fantastic!
Miles Hedge
Kings Plains NSW

Convicts

Sir: Any person convicted of a criminal act or have had a jail sentence cannot be prevented from sitting in Government in Parliament as a precedent has been set. A man named William Groom, at the age of thirteen, was transported to Australia and sentenced to 7 years. When released, he later was convicted of stealing gold in Bathurst. After serving his time, he went to Queensland and he eventually became a member of the legislative assembly and was elected to the first Federal Parliament in 1901 but died later that same year. So Rod Culleton’s annulled conviction cannot stop him from becoming a senator, as he and others should be held to the same Parliamentary standards and laws as William Groom.
L. R. Sullivan
Charters Towers, QLD

Prisons and the public

Sir: Your leading article on the sorry state of our prisons (19 November) was very welcome. However, you refer to the ‘public demand’ for sending offenders to prison. I have to query this. I cannot think of any occasion when the public has been consulted on prisons or sentencing policy or on the exceptionally high cost of incarceration.

We currently have an unthinking and punitive culture, generated by tabloid newspapers and politicians competing to show how tough they are. It is hardly surprising that the coalition government’s search for savings targeted prison staff and community supervision, with results that can be seen today.
Peter Barker (former Senior Probation Officer in HMP Maidstone)
Snettisham, Norfolk

70 years of peace

Sir: Brian Thornton says (Letters, 19 November) that many of my generation who lived as children through the 1940s voted to leave the EU because they saw vital powers slipping away to unelected bureaucrats. I lived through the 1940s, remember my father taking me to the window and seeing London burning, and I voted to remain. I do not consider myself one of the elite; I read informed opinion and make my own judgment.


We have had 70 years of peace in Europe and I value that far more than I fear any alleged loss of sovereignty as a result of Britain being a member of the EU.

We should be proud of our achievement in helping to build the European Union in past years. Instead of working for change within the EU, we leave it as the result of a slender majority in the referendum. I fear for my grandchildren in 20 years’ time.
Ian Sutherland
Eversley, Hampshire

Russian lessons

Sir: The outrage of the metropolitan elite in the face of Brexit, Trump et al (‘The new normal’, 19 November) reminds me of learning Russian in the 1960s. In those Cold War days the only native speakers we could meet to practise the language with were emigrés. They were charming and educated people deeply distressed at what had happened to their country, but they completely failed to grasp that they might themselves be partly responsible for the revolution.
Prof Robin Jacoby
Hethe, Oxon

NHS rationing

Sir: Rod Liddle is right to say that this is the year when the previous ‘givens’ of the past 50 years are questioned (‘The new normal’, 19 November). He mentions many examples — economic, social and political — but he doesn’t dare mention the greatest shibboleth of then all: the NHS. It has long been a given that governments of both hues will criticise each other for not putting enough resources into the health service and, when in power, continuing to pour money into that bottomless pit. When are we going to have a rational debate that talks about rationing of services to suit our indebted nation? It must be time to look at the original idea again and come up with a more achievable goal than simply free services for all.
Hugo Johnsen
Suffolk

Declining standards

Sir: Charles Moore’s concern about the standard of English currently expected of young people (Notes, 19 November) is well-founded, and evidence of a similar decline can be found in other subjects. In modern languages, candidates are no longer required to write a brief essay in the target language; and in physics, questions once deemed suitable for 16-year-olds at O-level are now found at A-level.

In February the OECD published a report on educational standards in 29 developed countries, which showed that the standard of literacy and numeracy of young people in this country has slumped from top to bottom over a generation.
Peter Inson
East Mersea, Essex

The look of love

Sir: Ariane Sherine may have been unlucky in love (‘The perfect mismatch’, 19 November), but surely she is not saying Marlowe and Shakespeare were both wrong: ‘Who ever loved that loved not at first sight’?
Michael McManus
Leeds

The post Australian letters appeared first on The Spectator.

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.


Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Close