<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-K3L4M3" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

Bridge

Bridge

15 June 2019

9:00 AM

15 June 2019

9:00 AM

Bridge is such a complex, multi-layered game that a single hand can be approached in myriad ways, depending on the skill of the player. In fact, peering into the mind of a world-class player is a bit like entering another dimension; there are possibilities you didn’t even know existed.
 
At a recent pairs tournament, most North-South pairs bid and made 4♠on the deal below. How, I wondered, did Artur Malinowski manage an overtrick? His answer blew me away:
 
West (Justin Hackett) led a trump. Artur drew a second round, then ran the 9 to  East’s A. East switched to a heart. West won the Q with his K, and returned the J to Artur’s A. Ten tricks were in the bag: 5 spades, the A, a ruff, two diamonds (via another finesse) and the ♣A. But could West be squeezed in clubs and diamonds for an extra trick?
 
Here was Artur’s thinking: West was a top player. Had he held 4+ diamonds and the ♣K, he would have foreseen the squeeze, and broken it up by playing a second diamond (sorry, this is tricky stuff). So Artur decided to place him with the ♣J instead. He ruffed a heart in dummy and played the ♣Q — a technique known as transferring the menace.
 
After capturing East’s ♣K with his ♣A he played trumps, reaching this position: ♠A 4 ♣105 opposite KJ10 ♣7. West held uQ65 ♣J. On the ♠A West was squeezed. He discarded the ♣J and Artur’s ♣10 became his 11th trick. Genius.

Got something to add? Join the discussion and comment below.

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.


Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Close