The biggest obstacle facing the campaign for Indigenous constitutional recognition remains the lack of detail concerning the role and operation of the proposed Voice to Parliament.
Supporters of recognition who dismiss so-called scaremongering critics concerned about the creation of a ‘third chamber of parliament’ – on the grounds that the advice given by the Voice will be non-binding and parliament will, therefore, remain supreme – ignore what’s really behind the recognition movement: the politics of Indigenous affairs.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe for just $2 a week
Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in