So committed to the Constitutional ‘Voice’ Recognition movement are some commentators that they can happily concede that the recent High Court decision that effectively grants Aborigines a special, privileged status in Australia is bonkers; that the judges who did that seem to be activists, out of control activists; that Aboriginal activists have already seized on this decision to push for more; and that it is now considerably harder to argue that any constitutional changes, any at all, will be safe from further judicial activism still – and yet they want to push on all the same.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe for just $2 a week
Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Unlock this article
You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in