The High Court ruling on George Pell is a testament to the integrity of our legal system. It shows that the presumption of innocence still carries great weight in our courts, and that the High Court rightly remains unaffected by public sentiment.
Yet yesterday, in their analysis for The Conversation, academics Ben Mathews and Mark Thomas disagree.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe for just $2 a week
Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in