<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-K3L4M3" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

Features Australia

Business/Robbery etc.

28 November 2020

9:00 AM

28 November 2020

9:00 AM

Menzies’ home ownership or Keating’s super?

Home ownership or superannuation? For an increasing proportion of Australians, it’s one or the other. That is one of the many unresolved problems (with few suggested solutions) outlined in last week’s comprehensive 648-page Treasury Review of Australia’s Retirement Income. At least it supplied a mountain of facts on which an informed debate can take place, although, as one contributor to the review lamented, this will not prevent ‘a balanced discussion of the retirement income system being bedevilled by narratives that serve vested interest rather than the common good’.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Subscribe for just $2 a week

Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.

  • Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
  • The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
  • Spectator podcasts and newsletters
  • Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or

Unlock this article

REGISTER

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.


Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Close