As the High Court judges retire to consider the Science Case of the Year, Peter Ridd v James Cook University, the underlying issue remains … well, underlying. And that is the matter of reliable science. Ridd’s ‘transgression’ was to point out that better quality control over research into the Great Barrier Reef is desirable.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe for just $2 a week
Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in