The cheaper alternative to conventional conflict for opponents of the US (and Australia) is to engineer endless ‘wars of the flea’. It took twenty years in Afghanistan, but didn’t we just get schooled on that one! The theory was outlined by US scholar Robert Taber: in the war against the flea, the state suffers the dog’s disadvantages – too much to defend against a small, agile, ubiquitous enemy.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe for just $2 a week
Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or
Unlock this article
You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in