The world was recently stunned to hear a US Supreme Court nominee tell the Senate what ‘progress’ it was to see a woman selected for the great post – and then with her next breath expressed confusion as to what a woman was… Her astounding reply that she ‘didn’t know because she wasn’t a biologist’ says much about what the far-fringe has been promoting in the public forum for decades.
It’s little surprise this absurdity has finally arrived in Australia, landing in the words of an esteemed federal judge.
There have been incessant attempts to replace common sense with the bedlam of...
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe for just $2 a week
Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in