The International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005, which finds its roots in the International Sanitary Conference 1851, is a legal instrument ratified by 196 member countries of the World Health Organisation (WHO), endeavours to: ‘Prevent, protect against, control, and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease.’ While its main objective is laudable – concerns arise about the potential erosion of human rights, dignity, and freedoms in its execution – this article provides a critique of these concerns, focusing on its ability to potentially censor information, which can negatively impact the fundamental principles of transparency, accountability, and inclusivity....
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe for just $2 a week
Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in