The twentieth-century philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein said ‘philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language’. We’ve just experienced the most remarkably lucid example, possibly in the whole of modern history, of Wittgenstein’s axiom. And the linguistic sorcery, extraordinarily enough, happened in a courtroom in Australia where a judge stated, in Tickle v.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe for just $2 a week
Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.
- Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
- The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
- Spectator podcasts and newsletters
- Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or
Unlock this article
You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it. Try your first month for free, then just $2 a week for the remainder of your first year.
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
SUBSCRIBEAlready a subscriber? Log in