<iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-K3L4M3" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

Flat White

Bring back conscientious objection

Informed consent, parental rights, and the overreach of the No Jab, No Pay policy

8 November 2024

12:17 AM

8 November 2024

12:17 AM

In recent years, Australian government policy has increasingly linked access to essential benefits for families with childhood vaccination requirements. These measures, notably the No Jab, No Pay policy, were implemented with the stated goal of protecting children and the wider community from vaccine-preventable diseases. However, the policy has sparked significant debate, particularly around issues of informed consent, parental rights, and government overreach.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Subscribe for just $2 a week

Try a month of The Spectator Australia absolutely free and without commitment. Not only that but – if you choose to continue – you’ll pay just $2 a week for your first year.

  • Unlimited access to spectator.com.au and app
  • The weekly edition on the Spectator Australia app
  • Spectator podcasts and newsletters
  • Full access to spectator.co.uk
Or

Unlock this article

REGISTER


Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator Australia readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Close